eISSN: 3023-6940
  • Home
  • Impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robotic radical prostatectomy on early postoperative continence
E-SUBMISSION

Original Research

Impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robotic radical prostatectomy on early postoperative continence


1 Amerikan Hospital, Department of Urology, İstanbul, Turkey
2 Koç University, School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistic, İstanbul, Turkey
3 Amerikan Hospital, Nursing Services, İstanbul, Turkey
4 Koç University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology, İstanbul, Turkey


DOI : 10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1215737
New J Urol. 2023;18(1):70-77

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to assess the urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) and associated factors in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and its effect on early continence.

Material and Methods:  The data of 81 patients who underwent RARP between February 2017 and June 2022 were evaluated in this retrospective analysis. On the seventh postoperative day, we performed a cystography to determine whether the patients had UAL. Uni- and multivariate analyses were done to investigate the factors that could lead to UAL. Continence rates were recorded in patients at 6-12 weeks after surgery.

Results: Overall 25 patients (31%) had UAL; of them 12 (15%) were mild, eight (10%) were moderate, and five (6%) were extensive. A drain/serum creatinine ratio >1.5 and a prostate volume >53 cm3 were determined to be significant in predicting UAL in both the uni- and multivariate analyses (p=0.017 and p=0.046, respectively). On the postoperative second or third day, of the 36 patients who had drain output greater than 100 ml, eight (22%) had a high drain/serum creatinine ratio (>1.5), seven (88%) of which had UAL. According to the early period follow-up data, incontinence was prevalent in 9 (36%) of the patients with UAL and 20 (%37) of the patients without UAL (p=0.959).

Conclusion: Cystography is an effective method for detecting leakage after RARP. A large prostate volume (>53 cm3) and a high postoperative drain/serum creatinine ratio (>1.5) were found to be associated with UAL. UAL had no effect on early continence.

Keywords: anastomotic leak, cystography, prostatectomy, robot-assisted, urinary incontinence


ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to assess the urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) and associated factors in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and its effect on early continence.

Material and Methods:  The data of 81 patients who underwent RARP between February 2017 and June 2022 were evaluated in this retrospective analysis. On the seventh postoperative day, we performed a cystography to determine whether the patients had UAL. Uni- and multivariate analyses were done to investigate the factors that could lead to UAL. Continence rates were recorded in patients at 6-12 weeks after surgery.

Results: Overall 25 patients (31%) had UAL; of them 12 (15%) were mild, eight (10%) were moderate, and five (6%) were extensive. A drain/serum creatinine ratio >1.5 and a prostate volume >53 cm3 were determined to be significant in predicting UAL in both the uni- and multivariate analyses (p=0.017 and p=0.046, respectively). On the postoperative second or third day, of the 36 patients who had drain output greater than 100 ml, eight (22%) had a high drain/serum creatinine ratio (>1.5), seven (88%) of which had UAL. According to the early period follow-up data, incontinence was prevalent in 9 (36%) of the patients with UAL and 20 (%37) of the patients without UAL (p=0.959).

Conclusion: Cystography is an effective method for detecting leakage after RARP. A large prostate volume (>53 cm3) and a high postoperative drain/serum creatinine ratio (>1.5) were found to be associated with UAL. UAL had no effect on early continence.

Keywords: anastomotic leak, cystography, prostatectomy, robot-assisted, urinary incontinence

Resources

  • 1.Gnanapragasam VJ, Baker P, Naisby GP, Chadwick D. Identification and validation of risk factors for vesicourethral leaks following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2005;12(11):948-52. Epub 2005/12/15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01166.x
  • 2.Ramsden AR, Chodak GW. Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2004;93(4):503-6. Epub 2004/03/11 https://10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04668.x
  • 3.Tyritzis SI, Katafigiotis I, Constantinides CA. All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012;188(2):369-76. Epub 2012/06/16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.126
  • 4.Kakutani S, Takeshima Y, Yamada Y et al. Clinical significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):75. Epub 2021/05/05. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00844-1
  • 5.Tillier C, van Muilekom HAM, Bloos-van der Hulst J, Grivas N, van der Poel HG. Vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) evaluation of short- and long-term outcome after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP): selective cystogram to improve outcome. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(4):441-6. Epub 2017/01/13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0677-1
  • 6.Han KS, Choi HJ, Jung DC et al. A prospective evaluation of conventional cystography for detection of urine leakage at the vesicourethral anastomosis site after radical prostatectomy based on computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(3):251-6. Epub 2011/02/08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.08.009
  • 7.Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. Epub 2002/02/22. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10052
  • 8.Cormio L, Di Fino G, Scavone C et al. Prognostic Factors for Anastomotic Urinary Leakage Following Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy and Correlation With Voiding Outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(16):e3475. Epub 2016/04/23. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000003475
  • 9.Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):996-1003. Epub 2006/11/03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.014
  • 10.Student V, Jr., Vidlar A, Grepl M et al. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2017;71(5):822-30. Epub 2016/06/11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032
  • 11.Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M et al. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):485-95. Epub 2015/08/25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005
  • 12.Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA et al. Corrigendum re: "Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy" [Eur Urol 2011;59:72-80]. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):e56. Epub 2018/05/24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.007
  • 13.Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008;180(3):1018-23. Epub 2008/07/22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.046
  • 14.Mattei A, Birkhaeuser FD, Baermann C, Warncke SH, Studer UE. To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2008;179(2):582-6. Epub 2007/12/15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.066
  • 15.Regmi SK, Bearrick EN, Hannah PTF et al. Drain fluid creatinine-to-serum creatinine ratio as an initial test to detect urine leakage following cystectomy: A retrospective study. Indian J Urol. 2021;37(2):153-8. Epub 2021/06/10. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_396_20
  • 16.Sukkarieh T, Harmon J, Penna F, Parra R. Incidence and management of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic prostatectomy with implementation of a new anastomotic technique incorporating posterior bladder neck tailoring. J Robot Surg. 2007;1(3):213-5. Epub 2007/01/01. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0046-6
  • 17.Sandhu JS, Gotto GT, Herran LA et al. Age, obesity, medical comorbidities and surgical technique are predictive of symptomatic anastomotic strictures after contemporary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011;185(6):2148-52. Epub 2011/04/19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.003
  • 18.Dalton DP, Schaeffer AJ, Garnett JE, Grayhack JT. Radiographic assessment of the vesicourethral anastomosis directing early decatheterization following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1989;141(1):79-81. Epub 1989/01/01. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40595-7
  • 19.Tiguert R, Rigaud J, Fradet Y. Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2004;63(3):513-7. Epub 2004/03/19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.042
  • 20.Varkarakis J, Wirtenberger W, Pinggera GM et al. Evaluation of urinary extravasation and results after continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):991-5. Epub 2004/11/16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05092.x
  • 21.Ha YS, Bak DJ, Chung JW et al. Postoperative cystographic findings as an independent predictor of urinary incontinence three months after radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(3):278-84. Epub 2016/09/30. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-2249.16.02763-6
  • 22.Patil N, Krane L, Javed K et al. Evaluating and grading cystographic leakage: correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2009;103(8):1108-10. Epub 2008/11/22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08168.x
  • 23.Tohi Y, Kohashiguchi K, Miura T et al. Impact of the severity of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on urinary continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(5):1175-81. Epub 2022/01/30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01357-7