eISSN: 3023-6940
  • Home
  • Our mini-incidentaloma series whom we applied surgical treatment

Original Research

Our mini-incidentaloma series whom we applied surgical treatment


1 Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye

2 Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, Kütahya, Türkiye

3 Muş Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Muş, Türkiye

4 Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye

5 Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Hastalıkları Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye


DOI :
New J Urol. 2016; 11 (1): 22-27

Abstract

Objective:  Adrenal incidentolamas have been defined as adrenal lesions less than 1 cm in size with an   incidence ranging between 1.4, and 8.7 % median  2.3%. Adrenal masses less than 1 cm are generally non-functional, while tho-se larger than 6 cm in diameter are functional with a probability of  40 percent. Adrenal masses smaller than 4 cm  in diameter has a malignancy potential of 2 percent. While those  measuring 4-6 cm or  greater than 6 cm have malignancy potentials of 6 %, and 25 %, respectively. Besi-des, non-functional adrenal masses larger than 4 cm are candidates for surgery, however for small myelipomas, benign cysts, and non-functional adenomas surgical treatment may not be requ-ired  unless they become  symptomatic.In this study, in the light of the literature, we aimed to review approach to, and surgical treatment of adrenal masses which we encounter in our cli-nical practice.

Material and Methods:  Patients whom we followed up, and treated surgically between Ja-nuary 2010, and January 2015 in our clinics of urology, and general surgery with the indication of adrenal mass, were retrospectively screened, and 14 patients were included in our analysis. The patients underwent ultrasonographic US, computed tomographic CT and magnetic re-sonance imaging MRI techniques. Biochemi-cal blood analyses of dehydroepiandrosterone DHEA, cortisol, metanephrine, normetaneph-rine, total testosterone, thyroid stimulating  hormone TSH, vanillyl mandelic acid VMA, al-dosterone, and  renin were performed. Adrenal masses of our patients were evaluated as functional in 3, and non-functional in 11 cases.

Results: A total of 14 patients 4 male, and 10 female were inc-luded in the study. Mean age of the patients was 54.7 years range, 33-74 yrs. Mean diameter of the adrenal masses was 8.8 cm range, 5.5 - 23 cm. These patients underwent open surgical excision n=5 or laparoscopic surgical excision n=9. Histopathology of the adrenal masses was reported as malign n=2 or benign n=12 lesions.

Conclusion:  Adrenal glands are anatomically small in size, ho-wever they possess critically important vital functions. Therefore, approach to adrenal masses, and their treatment should be evalua-ted preoperatively from endocrinologic perspective, and necessary endocrinologic preparations should be completed before the sur-gery. Pre-, peri-, and post-operative elaboration of especially hor-mone-active cases carries utmost importance. Surgical success is directly proportional to multidisciplinary collaboration.

Key Words: İncidentolama, surgical treatment, multidiscipli-


Abstract

Objective:  Adrenal incidentolamas have been defined as adrenal lesions less than 1 cm in size with an   incidence ranging between 1.4, and 8.7 % median  2.3%. Adrenal masses less than 1 cm are generally non-functional, while tho-se larger than 6 cm in diameter are functional with a probability of  40 percent. Adrenal masses smaller than 4 cm  in diameter has a malignancy potential of 2 percent. While those  measuring 4-6 cm or  greater than 6 cm have malignancy potentials of 6 %, and 25 %, respectively. Besi-des, non-functional adrenal masses larger than 4 cm are candidates for surgery, however for small myelipomas, benign cysts, and non-functional adenomas surgical treatment may not be requ-ired  unless they become  symptomatic.In this study, in the light of the literature, we aimed to review approach to, and surgical treatment of adrenal masses which we encounter in our cli-nical practice.

Material and Methods:  Patients whom we followed up, and treated surgically between Ja-nuary 2010, and January 2015 in our clinics of urology, and general surgery with the indication of adrenal mass, were retrospectively screened, and 14 patients were included in our analysis. The patients underwent ultrasonographic US, computed tomographic CT and magnetic re-sonance imaging MRI techniques. Biochemi-cal blood analyses of dehydroepiandrosterone DHEA, cortisol, metanephrine, normetaneph-rine, total testosterone, thyroid stimulating  hormone TSH, vanillyl mandelic acid VMA, al-dosterone, and  renin were performed. Adrenal masses of our patients were evaluated as functional in 3, and non-functional in 11 cases.

Results: A total of 14 patients 4 male, and 10 female were inc-luded in the study. Mean age of the patients was 54.7 years range, 33-74 yrs. Mean diameter of the adrenal masses was 8.8 cm range, 5.5 - 23 cm. These patients underwent open surgical excision n=5 or laparoscopic surgical excision n=9. Histopathology of the adrenal masses was reported as malign n=2 or benign n=12 lesions.

Conclusion:  Adrenal glands are anatomically small in size, ho-wever they possess critically important vital functions. Therefore, approach to adrenal masses, and their treatment should be evalua-ted preoperatively from endocrinologic perspective, and necessary endocrinologic preparations should be completed before the sur-gery. Pre-, peri-, and post-operative elaboration of especially hor-mone-active cases carries utmost importance. Surgical success is directly proportional to multidisciplinary collaboration.

Key Words: İncidentolama, surgical treatment, multidiscipli-