Animals
This current research was conducted at Kafkas University Laboratory Animal Center following the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.” Ethical approval for the project was obtained from the Kafkas University Animal Research Local Ethics Committee (decision date/number: 01-03-2023/2023-021). This study was funded by the Kafkas University Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project number: 2023-TS-58). A total of 36 male Wistar albino rats (aged 8–12 weeks, weighing 180–260 grams) were used in the study. The rats were housed with ad libitum food access in a room maintained at 22 ± 2°C with a 12-hour light-dark cycle.
Groups
The rats were randomly divided into six equal groups:
Control group: Nephrectomy was performed on healthy kidney tissue after anesthesia.
Ischemia group: One kidney was subjected to ischemia for one hour after anesthesia, and the damaged kidney was then removed. Although a separate sham group was not used, the control group underwent both anesthesia and nephrectomy without ischemia, reflecting both healthy renal tissue and surgical stress response. Thus, it served the functional purpose of a sham group.
IR group: One kidney underwent one hour of ischemia followed by one hour of reperfusion after anesthesia. The kidney tissue was removed after completing the reperfusion phase.
Placebo group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia followed by one hour of reperfusion. The rats were administered 12.5 ml/kg saline intraperitoneally 24 hours before surgery. At the conclusion of the reperfusion phase, kidney tissue was extracted.
Preoperative albumin (A1) group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia and one hour of reperfusion. The rats were given 2.5 g/kg of 20% HSA (12.5 ml/kg) intraperitoneally 24 hours before surgery (13, 14). At the conclusion of the reperfusion phase, kidney tissue was extracted.
Intraoperative albumin (A2) group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia and one hour of reperfusion. The rats were administered 2.5 g/kg of 20% HSA (12.5 ml/kg) intraperitoneally 30 minutes before the start of reperfusion. Kidney tissue was removed after the reperfusion period.
Anesthesia
Rats were given intramuscular injections of 90 mg/kg ketamine (Keta-Control®, Doa Pharmaceuticals) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Vetaxyl®, Vet-Agro) to induce anesthesia (15). The procedures were carried out with constant monitoring and careful management of anesthesia, ensuring the well-being of the animals throughout the process.
Surgical Procedure
Following the induction of anesthesia, all rats were positioned in the supine position, and the surgical site was shaved and disinfected. An abdominal incision measuring 2 cm was performed. The renal artery of the kidney was blocked using 3/0 silk sutures to induce ischemia, and then the abdomen was closed. To achieve reperfusion, the surgical team reopened the abdominal cavity, removed the sutures around the renal artery, and then closed the abdomen again. Following the restoration of blood flow, the abdominal cavity was surgically accessed, and samples of tissue and blood were obtained. At the end of the entire experimental phase, the animals were responsibly sacrificed via decapitation while under deep anesthesia.
Biochemical Analyses
Serum samples were assessed to determine ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), and the oxidative stress index (OSI). The levels of TOS and TAS were quantified using Erel’s automated colorimetric method (Rel Assay Diagnostics®, Mega Tıp, Türkiye). TOS results were expressed in µmol H₂O₂ Eq/L, while TAS values were presented in mmol Trolox Eq/L. OSI, an indicator of oxidative stress, was calculated as the ratio of TOS to TAS using the formula µmol [(TOS / (TAS × 1000)) × 100]. IMA concentrations were measured with a colorimetric approach (Rel Assay Diagnostics®, Mega Tıp, Turkey) and a spectrophotometer, with outcomes reported in u/L.
Histological Analyses
Following the experimental procedures, kidney tissues were preserved in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Serial sections of 5 µm thickness were cut using a microtome (Leica RM2125RTS). The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and images were captured using a light microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan). Each kidney was evaluated using two slides, and five fields per slide were analyzed under 20x magnification for scoring. The cortex and medulla were scored separately (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). Total tissue damage was calculated by summing the scores.
Cortical damage was assessed by evaluating cellular changes in Bowman’s capsules, distal tubules, and proximal tubules. Medullary damage was assessed by examining debris and hemorrhage in descending and ascending Henle’s loops and the tubules.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluations were performed using avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) staining. Polyclonal MPO primary antibody (Elabscience, E-AB-10466, 1/50), polyclonal GSR primary antibody (Elabscience, E-AB-14115, 1/50), and polyclonal SOD1 primary antibody (Cloud-Clone, PAB960Ra01, 1/50) were used for IHC staining. Images were acquired with a light microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan). Each animal was assessed using two slides and five fields, and the immunoreactivity intensities of kidney histological structures (glomerulus, Bowman’s capsule, urinary space, vascular space, distal tubule, and proximal tubule in the cortex) were determined.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data and as median with interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed or ordinal data. For comparisons between multiple groups, one-way ANOVA was applied for normally distributed variables; when a significant difference was detected, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons of non-normally distributed or ordinal data. When a significant difference was detected, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using the Dunn-Bonferroni test to control the Type I error rate.
A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Exact p-values (e.g., p=0.032) were reported rather than threshold values. Effect sizes (e.g., eta squared for ANOVA or Cohen’s d for pairwise comparisons) were not calculated due to the unavailability of raw data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
This current research was conducted at Kafkas University Laboratory Animal Center following the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.” Ethical approval for the project was obtained from the Kafkas University Animal Research Local Ethics Committee (decision date/number: 01-03-2023/2023-021). This study was funded by the Kafkas University Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project number: 2023-TS-58). A total of 36 male Wistar albino rats (aged 8–12 weeks, weighing 180–260 grams) were used in the study. The rats were housed with ad libitum food access in a room maintained at 22 ± 2°C with a 12-hour light-dark cycle.
Groups
The rats were randomly divided into six equal groups:
Control group: Nephrectomy was performed on healthy kidney tissue after anesthesia.
Ischemia group: One kidney was subjected to ischemia for one hour after anesthesia, and the damaged kidney was then removed. Although a separate sham group was not used, the control group underwent both anesthesia and nephrectomy without ischemia, reflecting both healthy renal tissue and surgical stress response. Thus, it served the functional purpose of a sham group.
IR group: One kidney underwent one hour of ischemia followed by one hour of reperfusion after anesthesia. The kidney tissue was removed after completing the reperfusion phase.
Placebo group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia followed by one hour of reperfusion. The rats were administered 12.5 ml/kg saline intraperitoneally 24 hours before surgery. At the conclusion of the reperfusion phase, kidney tissue was extracted.
Preoperative albumin (A1) group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia and one hour of reperfusion. The rats were given 2.5 g/kg of 20% HSA (12.5 ml/kg) intraperitoneally 24 hours before surgery (13, 14). At the conclusion of the reperfusion phase, kidney tissue was extracted.
Intraoperative albumin (A2) group: The procedure included one hour of ischemia and one hour of reperfusion. The rats were administered 2.5 g/kg of 20% HSA (12.5 ml/kg) intraperitoneally 30 minutes before the start of reperfusion. Kidney tissue was removed after the reperfusion period.
Anesthesia
Rats were given intramuscular injections of 90 mg/kg ketamine (Keta-Control®, Doa Pharmaceuticals) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Vetaxyl®, Vet-Agro) to induce anesthesia (15). The procedures were carried out with constant monitoring and careful management of anesthesia, ensuring the well-being of the animals throughout the process.
Surgical Procedure
Following the induction of anesthesia, all rats were positioned in the supine position, and the surgical site was shaved and disinfected. An abdominal incision measuring 2 cm was performed. The renal artery of the kidney was blocked using 3/0 silk sutures to induce ischemia, and then the abdomen was closed. To achieve reperfusion, the surgical team reopened the abdominal cavity, removed the sutures around the renal artery, and then closed the abdomen again. Following the restoration of blood flow, the abdominal cavity was surgically accessed, and samples of tissue and blood were obtained. At the end of the entire experimental phase, the animals were responsibly sacrificed via decapitation while under deep anesthesia.
Biochemical Analyses
Serum samples were assessed to determine ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), and the oxidative stress index (OSI). The levels of TOS and TAS were quantified using Erel’s automated colorimetric method (Rel Assay Diagnostics®, Mega Tıp, Türkiye). TOS results were expressed in µmol H₂O₂ Eq/L, while TAS values were presented in mmol Trolox Eq/L. OSI, an indicator of oxidative stress, was calculated as the ratio of TOS to TAS using the formula µmol [(TOS / (TAS × 1000)) × 100]. IMA concentrations were measured with a colorimetric approach (Rel Assay Diagnostics®, Mega Tıp, Turkey) and a spectrophotometer, with outcomes reported in u/L.
Histological Analyses
Following the experimental procedures, kidney tissues were preserved in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Serial sections of 5 µm thickness were cut using a microtome (Leica RM2125RTS). The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and images were captured using a light microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan). Each kidney was evaluated using two slides, and five fields per slide were analyzed under 20x magnification for scoring. The cortex and medulla were scored separately (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). Total tissue damage was calculated by summing the scores.
Cortical damage was assessed by evaluating cellular changes in Bowman’s capsules, distal tubules, and proximal tubules. Medullary damage was assessed by examining debris and hemorrhage in descending and ascending Henle’s loops and the tubules.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluations were performed using avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) staining. Polyclonal MPO primary antibody (Elabscience, E-AB-10466, 1/50), polyclonal GSR primary antibody (Elabscience, E-AB-14115, 1/50), and polyclonal SOD1 primary antibody (Cloud-Clone, PAB960Ra01, 1/50) were used for IHC staining. Images were acquired with a light microscope (Olympus BX53, Tokyo, Japan). Each animal was assessed using two slides and five fields, and the immunoreactivity intensities of kidney histological structures (glomerulus, Bowman’s capsule, urinary space, vascular space, distal tubule, and proximal tubule in the cortex) were determined.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data and as median with interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed or ordinal data. For comparisons between multiple groups, one-way ANOVA was applied for normally distributed variables; when a significant difference was detected, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons of non-normally distributed or ordinal data. When a significant difference was detected, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using the Dunn-Bonferroni test to control the Type I error rate.
A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Exact p-values (e.g., p=0.032) were reported rather than threshold values. Effect sizes (e.g., eta squared for ANOVA or Cohen’s d for pairwise comparisons) were not calculated due to the unavailability of raw data.