This retrospective study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of HR and VHR NMIBC patients treated with adequate BCG therapy, aiming to address the knowledge gap regarding the applicability of the EAU risk stratification in this specific population. Our findings revealed several key observations.
Firstly, despite the VHR group exhibiting more aggressive tumor characteristics at baseline, including older age, larger and multiple tumors, higher pT stage, presence of CIS, variant histology, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor necrosis, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in overall recurrence or progression rates between the HR and VHR groups. This suggests that BCG therapy may effectively mitigate the increased risk associated with these adverse pathological features, at least in terms of overall recurrence and progression rates. This finding is crucial, as it indicates that BCG remains a valuable treatment option even for patients classified as VHR according to the EAU criteria. Furthermore, EAU risk groups may not accurately reflect disease progression in patients classified as VHR who received immunotherapy. EAU risk stratification reports a 40% probability of progression at five years for the VHR group, potentially leading to recommendations for immediate radical cystectomy (4). However, our findings suggest that this risk estimation might be lower, particularly for patients receiving BCG therapy. This highlights the complexity of clinical decision-making for HR and VHR NMIBC patients. Studies have shown the efficacy of BCG therapy for preventing recurrence compared to intravesical chemotherapy, especially in the setting of maintenance treatment regimens (8). While some studies, such as the one by Schmidt et al., have not observed a statistically significant difference in disease progression or survival outcomes between BCG and intravesical chemotherapy (9), BCG therapy is generally recognized to delay or prevent progression (10). Lobo et al. recently reported lower disease progression rates in a study investigating the effect of BCG therapy on risk stratification. Patients in the VHR group who received induction BCG therapy (6.9%) and those who completed adequate BCG therapy (4.0%) demonstrated significantly lower progression rates at one year compared to the predicted rates of 16.0% according to the EAU risk stratification system. This trend persisted for five years, with lower progression rates observed in both the HR and VHR groups who received BCG therapy compared to the predicted EAU rates (7.4% vs. 9.6% and 16.7% vs. 40.0%, respectively) (10). Also, another recent study found a 25.8% progression risk for the VHR group at 5-year follow-up (11). Our study’s findings regarding the impact of BCG therapy on disease progression align with those reported in these studies, and a lower progression rate was observed in patients receiving BCG therapy compared to the rates predicted by the EAU risk stratification system.
In line with these observations, our analysis revealed no significant difference in PFS among patients classified as HR and VHR (91% vs 86%, p=0.311, respectively) who were treated with BCG. This observation underscores the potential therapeutic role of immunotherapy in the VHR patient population. Consequently, our findings suggest re-evaluation regarding the necessity of immediate radical cystectomy for patients classified as VHR, particularly considering the significant morbidity and mortality associated with this surgical intervention. Contieri et al. also investigated the accuracy of the new EAU NMIBC risk calculator, specifically evaluating its performance in a study including patients with T1 high-grade disease who underwent a second transurethral resection followed by BCG therapy (12). Their analysis revealed a five-year PFS rate of 68.2% for the entire cohort, with a further decrease to 59.9% within the VHR group. These findings led Contieri et al. to conclude that the new risk groups might underestimate the effectiveness of BCG therapy, potentially due to the inclusion of an age threshold within the risk stratification model (12). Notably, their study did not detect a significant impact of the 70-year age limit on the outcomes within their patient population. Similarly, Krajewski et al. reported an overestimation of progression rates within a cohort of high-grade NMIBC patients, observing a five-year PFS of 82.3% (13). For patients receiving BCG therapy, the CUETO risk scoring model remains a commonly employed tool for predicting disease progression (14). However, the inherent heterogeneity of BCG treatment regimens presents a significant challenge to accurate prediction.
The present study is not without its limitations. The retrospective design introduces inherent biases, including selection bias and potential data inconsistencies. Additionally, the study was conducted at a single institution, and the relatively small sample size, particularly in the very high-risk group, may limit the study’s findings.
DISCUSSION
This retrospective study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of HR and VHR NMIBC patients treated with adequate BCG therapy, aiming to address the knowledge gap regarding the applicability of the EAU risk stratification in this specific population. Our findings revealed several key observations.
Firstly, despite the VHR group exhibiting more aggressive tumor characteristics at baseline, including older age, larger and multiple tumors, higher pT stage, presence of CIS, variant histology, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor necrosis, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in overall recurrence or progression rates between the HR and VHR groups. This suggests that BCG therapy may effectively mitigate the increased risk associated with these adverse pathological features, at least in terms of overall recurrence and progression rates. This finding is crucial, as it indicates that BCG remains a valuable treatment option even for patients classified as VHR according to the EAU criteria. Furthermore, EAU risk groups may not accurately reflect disease progression in patients classified as VHR who received immunotherapy. EAU risk stratification reports a 40% probability of progression at five years for the VHR group, potentially leading to recommendations for immediate radical cystectomy (4). However, our findings suggest that this risk estimation might be lower, particularly for patients receiving BCG therapy. This highlights the complexity of clinical decision-making for HR and VHR NMIBC patients. Studies have shown the efficacy of BCG therapy for preventing recurrence compared to intravesical chemotherapy, especially in the setting of maintenance treatment regimens (8). While some studies, such as the one by Schmidt et al., have not observed a statistically significant difference in disease progression or survival outcomes between BCG and intravesical chemotherapy (9), BCG therapy is generally recognized to delay or prevent progression (10). Lobo et al. recently reported lower disease progression rates in a study investigating the effect of BCG therapy on risk stratification. Patients in the VHR group who received induction BCG therapy (6.9%) and those who completed adequate BCG therapy (4.0%) demonstrated significantly lower progression rates at one year compared to the predicted rates of 16.0% according to the EAU risk stratification system. This trend persisted for five years, with lower progression rates observed in both the HR and VHR groups who received BCG therapy compared to the predicted EAU rates (7.4% vs. 9.6% and 16.7% vs. 40.0%, respectively) (10). Also, another recent study found a 25.8% progression risk for the VHR group at 5-year follow-up (11). Our study’s findings regarding the impact of BCG therapy on disease progression align with those reported in these studies, and a lower progression rate was observed in patients receiving BCG therapy compared to the rates predicted by the EAU risk stratification system.
In line with these observations, our analysis revealed no significant difference in PFS among patients classified as HR and VHR (91% vs 86%, p=0.311, respectively) who were treated with BCG. This observation underscores the potential therapeutic role of immunotherapy in the VHR patient population. Consequently, our findings suggest re-evaluation regarding the necessity of immediate radical cystectomy for patients classified as VHR, particularly considering the significant morbidity and mortality associated with this surgical intervention. Contieri et al. also investigated the accuracy of the new EAU NMIBC risk calculator, specifically evaluating its performance in a study including patients with T1 high-grade disease who underwent a second transurethral resection followed by BCG therapy (12). Their analysis revealed a five-year PFS rate of 68.2% for the entire cohort, with a further decrease to 59.9% within the VHR group. These findings led Contieri et al. to conclude that the new risk groups might underestimate the effectiveness of BCG therapy, potentially due to the inclusion of an age threshold within the risk stratification model (12). Notably, their study did not detect a significant impact of the 70-year age limit on the outcomes within their patient population. Similarly, Krajewski et al. reported an overestimation of progression rates within a cohort of high-grade NMIBC patients, observing a five-year PFS of 82.3% (13). For patients receiving BCG therapy, the CUETO risk scoring model remains a commonly employed tool for predicting disease progression (14). However, the inherent heterogeneity of BCG treatment regimens presents a significant challenge to accurate prediction.
The present study is not without its limitations. The retrospective design introduces inherent biases, including selection bias and potential data inconsistencies. Additionally, the study was conducted at a single institution, and the relatively small sample size, particularly in the very high-risk group, may limit the study’s findings.