eISSN: 3023-6940
  • Home
  • External Validation of CROES Stone Score System to Predict Treatment Success and Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Original Research

External Validation of CROES Stone Score System to Predict Treatment Success and Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy


1 Doç. Dr. Yaşar Eryılmaz Doğubayazıt Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Ağrı, Türkiye

2 Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, İzmir, Türkiye


DOI : 10.33719/yud.582491
New J Urol. 2019; 14 (2): 81-90

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the learning curve of the first 60 pa-tients on whom laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed in our clinic was evaluated retrospectively.

Materials and  Methods: Between January 2006 and June 2011, a total of 60 patients have been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal descending radical prostatectomy in our clinic. Preoperative and postoperative results of these patients were evaluated.

Results: The mean values of preoperative PSA and Gleason score were 8.8ng/ml and 6 respectively. The mean operation durati-on was 255 minutes, and the blood transfusion was needed in %60 of the patients. 4 patients were transitied to open surgery.Compli-cations were occured at early postoperative period in 7 patients. The mean hospital stay was 7 days. 10 patients required long-term cat-heterization. Operation time, transfusion rate, length of catheteri-zation, oncological outcomes, potency and continence status were evaluated.

 In the postoperative period, hemorrhagie was seen in 2 pati-ents, haematoma 5 and scrotal edema in 2. In 2 cases, catheter dura-tion was extended because of the anastomotic leakage. Transureth-ral incision was performed in 2 patients who developed postopera-tive anastomotic stricture. Potency was regained in 8 of the 22 patients who went through bilateral protective neurosurgery. In the postoperative period, PSA level was measured < 0,01 in 44 patients.       

Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is technically difficult method and it requires a considerably long  learning curve. Our results of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were similar to  open surgery. Although the number of patients is not enough, the results are promising.

Key Words: Prostate cancer, laparoscopic radical prostatec-tomy, laparoscopic extraperitonel radical prostatectomy


Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the learning curve of the first 60 pa-tients on whom laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed in our clinic was evaluated retrospectively.

Materials and  Methods: Between January 2006 and June 2011, a total of 60 patients have been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal descending radical prostatectomy in our clinic. Preoperative and postoperative results of these patients were evaluated.

Results: The mean values of preoperative PSA and Gleason score were 8.8ng/ml and 6 respectively. The mean operation durati-on was 255 minutes, and the blood transfusion was needed in %60 of the patients. 4 patients were transitied to open surgery.Compli-cations were occured at early postoperative period in 7 patients. The mean hospital stay was 7 days. 10 patients required long-term cat-heterization. Operation time, transfusion rate, length of catheteri-zation, oncological outcomes, potency and continence status were evaluated.

 In the postoperative period, hemorrhagie was seen in 2 pati-ents, haematoma 5 and scrotal edema in 2. In 2 cases, catheter dura-tion was extended because of the anastomotic leakage. Transureth-ral incision was performed in 2 patients who developed postopera-tive anastomotic stricture. Potency was regained in 8 of the 22 patients who went through bilateral protective neurosurgery. In the postoperative period, PSA level was measured < 0,01 in 44 patients.       

Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is technically difficult method and it requires a considerably long  learning curve. Our results of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were similar to  open surgery. Although the number of patients is not enough, the results are promising.

Key Words: Prostate cancer, laparoscopic radical prostatec-tomy, laparoscopic extraperitonel radical prostatectomy