There were no signs of death or visible toxicity in the rats. The biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical outcomes were analogous for the control and liraglutide-treated groups, therefore, we determined to evaluate them indiscriminately and to declare only the control group.
Urinary Volume
It was observed that the highest amount of urine was collected from the GEN-treated rats. This was statistically significant (p < 0.01). This indicated the presence of GEN-induced polyuria. There was no difference in the liraglutide injected group compared to the control group, pointing out the preventive effect of liraglutide towards ATN (Table 1).
Biochemical Variables
The urea and creatinine values were found to be statistically significantly higher in the group of rats treated with GEN alone (p<0.05). With the addition of Liraglutide to the treatment of rats under GEN, a decrease in serum urea and creatinine levels was observed. Na+ and K+ values among the four groups had similarities (Table 1).
When MDA and GSH values were calculated, it was observed that the MDA value in the 4th group and the GSH value in the 3rd group were significantly lower than the other groups (p<0.05). Application of liraglutide after GEN treatment provided a statistically significant increase in GSH values (p < 0.05). When E-cadherin and TGF - β1 values were evaluated, it was observed that they were increased in the group treated with GEN. These values were statistically significant when compared with the control group. TGF - β1 and E - cadherin values decreased significantly after liraglutide injection (p<0.05). The details are shown in Table 2.
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Results
While mild tubular damage such as granular and vacuolar degeneration was observed in the tubular epithelium in animals belonging to the control group (Figure 1), neutrophil or mononuclear cell infiltration was not detected in the intertubular, interstitial, and perivascular areas. Moderate and severe tubular necrosis, degeneration, dilatation, vacuolization in the tubular epithelium, epithelial hyperplasia, and mild interstitial and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltration were observed in the 2nd and 3rd groups. In the comparison between groups in Table-3, it was seen that tubular necrosis and interstitial fibrosis were more severe in the groups given GEN. In the group given GEN+Liraglutide, a similar histopathological appearance was observed in the control group. Leukocyte infiltration and iNOS were observed to be more severe in the groups that intervened with GEN, and when liraglutide was added to the treatment, similar results were obtained in the control group. (Figure 2 and Figure 3) (Table 3 and Table 4). Epithelial hyperplasia and mononuclear inflammatory cells were observed in the kidney tissues after liraglutide treatment. There was a decrease in the number of degenerative tubules and mononuclear inflammatory cells (Figure 4).
Varying degrees of positive reaction were found in all groups, including the control group in the immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 5). An anti-iNOS immune positive reaction was observed especially in proximal tubular epithelium. The reaction was rarely observed in the glomerular area. Especially in the gentamicin-applied group, since tubular damage was more severe than in the other groups (Figure 6), the immune reaction was found less due to the absence or necrosis of the epithelium. Tubular damage was moderate in group 4. iNOS expression was higher in group 4 than in the group that was applied only gentamicin (Table 4).
Table 1. Effects of GEN alone and its combination with liraglutide on plasma urea, creatinine, Na+, K+, and 24-h urine volume levels in rats.
Table 2. Effects of liraglutide on rat kidney MDA, GSH, E-cadherin, and TGF-β1 levels.
Table 3. Semiquantitative analysis of tubular necrosis, interstitial fibrosis in control, GEN, GEN + Ve, and GEN + liraglutide groups.
Table 4. Comparison of leukocyte infiltration and iNOS between groups
Figure 1. Degenerated, swollen, and granular-looking tubular epithelium (arrows), control group, Bar = 50 µm, H&E
Figure 2. Degenerated, swollen, and granular-looking tubular epithelium, coarse nucleus structure (arrow), GEN group Bar = 20 µm, H&E
Figure 3. Degenerative tubules (stars), mononuclear inflammatory cells (arrow), GEN group, Bar = 20 µm, H&E
Figure 4. Epithelial hyperplasia areas (arrow), mononuclear inflammatory cells (stars), Gentamicin + Liraglutide group, Bar = 20 µm, H&E.
Figure 5. Slight anti-iNOS positive reaction, Control group, Bar = 50 µm, IHC
Figure 6. Strong positive anti-iNOS reaction showing intensity in proximal tubules, Gentamicin group, Bar = 50 µm, IHC
Figure 7. Widespread strong positive anti-iNOS reaction, liraglutide treated group, Bar = 20 µm, IHC
RESULTS
There were no signs of death or visible toxicity in the rats. The biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical outcomes were analogous for the control and liraglutide-treated groups, therefore, we determined to evaluate them indiscriminately and to declare only the control group.
Urinary Volume
It was observed that the highest amount of urine was collected from the GEN-treated rats. This was statistically significant (p < 0.01). This indicated the presence of GEN-induced polyuria. There was no difference in the liraglutide injected group compared to the control group, pointing out the preventive effect of liraglutide towards ATN (Table 1).
Biochemical Variables
The urea and creatinine values were found to be statistically significantly higher in the group of rats treated with GEN alone (p<0.05). With the addition of Liraglutide to the treatment of rats under GEN, a decrease in serum urea and creatinine levels was observed. Na+ and K+ values among the four groups had similarities (Table 1).
When MDA and GSH values were calculated, it was observed that the MDA value in the 4th group and the GSH value in the 3rd group were significantly lower than the other groups (p<0.05). Application of liraglutide after GEN treatment provided a statistically significant increase in GSH values (p < 0.05). When E-cadherin and TGF - β1 values were evaluated, it was observed that they were increased in the group treated with GEN. These values were statistically significant when compared with the control group. TGF - β1 and E - cadherin values decreased significantly after liraglutide injection (p<0.05). The details are shown in Table 2.
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Results
While mild tubular damage such as granular and vacuolar degeneration was observed in the tubular epithelium in animals belonging to the control group (Figure 1), neutrophil or mononuclear cell infiltration was not detected in the intertubular, interstitial, and perivascular areas. Moderate and severe tubular necrosis, degeneration, dilatation, vacuolization in the tubular epithelium, epithelial hyperplasia, and mild interstitial and perivascular mononuclear cell infiltration were observed in the 2nd and 3rd groups. In the comparison between groups in Table-3, it was seen that tubular necrosis and interstitial fibrosis were more severe in the groups given GEN. In the group given GEN+Liraglutide, a similar histopathological appearance was observed in the control group. Leukocyte infiltration and iNOS were observed to be more severe in the groups that intervened with GEN, and when liraglutide was added to the treatment, similar results were obtained in the control group. (Figure 2 and Figure 3) (Table 3 and Table 4). Epithelial hyperplasia and mononuclear inflammatory cells were observed in the kidney tissues after liraglutide treatment. There was a decrease in the number of degenerative tubules and mononuclear inflammatory cells (Figure 4).
Varying degrees of positive reaction were found in all groups, including the control group in the immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 5). An anti-iNOS immune positive reaction was observed especially in proximal tubular epithelium. The reaction was rarely observed in the glomerular area. Especially in the gentamicin-applied group, since tubular damage was more severe than in the other groups (Figure 6), the immune reaction was found less due to the absence or necrosis of the epithelium. Tubular damage was moderate in group 4. iNOS expression was higher in group 4 than in the group that was applied only gentamicin (Table 4).
Table 1. Effects of GEN alone and its combination with liraglutide on plasma urea, creatinine, Na+, K+, and 24-h urine volume levels in rats.
Table 2. Effects of liraglutide on rat kidney MDA, GSH, E-cadherin, and TGF-β1 levels.
Table 3. Semiquantitative analysis of tubular necrosis, interstitial fibrosis in control, GEN, GEN + Ve, and GEN + liraglutide groups.
Table 4. Comparison of leukocyte infiltration and iNOS between groups
Figure 1. Degenerated, swollen, and granular-looking tubular epithelium (arrows), control group, Bar = 50 µm, H&E
Figure 2. Degenerated, swollen, and granular-looking tubular epithelium, coarse nucleus structure (arrow), GEN group Bar = 20 µm, H&E
Figure 3. Degenerative tubules (stars), mononuclear inflammatory cells (arrow), GEN group, Bar = 20 µm, H&E
Figure 4. Epithelial hyperplasia areas (arrow), mononuclear inflammatory cells (stars), Gentamicin + Liraglutide group, Bar = 20 µm, H&E.
Figure 5. Slight anti-iNOS positive reaction, Control group, Bar = 50 µm, IHC
Figure 6. Strong positive anti-iNOS reaction showing intensity in proximal tubules, Gentamicin group, Bar = 50 µm, IHC
Figure 7. Widespread strong positive anti-iNOS reaction, liraglutide treated group, Bar = 20 µm, IHC